i think case number 1, as the onus would have been on mahela to address the reserve day, d/l, and bad light issues at the point it occurred. it would seem cowardly to address it retrospectively after the WC has been awarded to Aus.
however, with point number 1, its information that we were unaware of at the time, and were only educated following the victory, which would hold a lot more gusto as a moot point, and since there's an obvious manipulation/skirting aorund the law, it would hold a lot more credibility.



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote








Bookmarks